by Admin KarmaGirl - 10/2/2003 6:56:54 AM If you got no answer from support@stardock.com at all then we didn't get it |
Yep i got response, but not resolving trouble response ...
The WindowBlinds issue that you are referring to was responded to (the last time) on 9/3/03 without a response received back from you. |
??? the last response i got and i send a response is effectivly from the 9/3/03
[copy on]
From: "Philippe PAQUET"
To: "Stardock Support"
References:
Subject: Re: error message : WBload unable to start communication with server
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:33:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C37249.E7E92060"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4922.1500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800
C'est un message de format MIME en plusieurs parties.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C37249.E7E92060
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, i've the latest version avaible for Win98 2nd (WB 3.51.053)
It was not installed over an old version as i change my hard disk not =
long time ago and anyway, before each update i un-install previous =
version first ...
So ??
Philippe PAQUET
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Stardock Support=20
To: Philippe PAQUET=20
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: error message : WBload unable to start communication with =
server
Are you running an old version of WindowBlinds? What version are you
running? We used to (a long time ago) connect and report the "most
popular skin". But we have not done that since WC was developed. If
you installed over an old version, you may not be actually using the
new version if it did not overwrite WBload. I would suggest
uninstalling, rebooting, then installing the newest version of
WindowBlinds in Stardock Central.
Thank you,
Angie
[copy off]
and here the previous exhange :
[copy on]
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:13:01 +0200, Philippe PAQUET wrote:
>see the answers in your mail
>
>Philippe PAQUET
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stardock Support
> To: Philippe PAQUET
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:00 PM
> Subject: Re: error message : WBload unable to start communication with server
>
>
> To better assist you, we need a bit more information. Specifically,
> we need to know:
>
> 1) Your subscription/serial number
> OD-XXXXXXXX- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> 2) Your hardware configuration (video card and CPU are the most
> important ones)
> Video card : Hercules 3D prophetII MX
> CPU : Intel Pentium 3, 667 Mhz, 640 Mo SDRAM
>
> 3) What version of Windows you are running
> Win98 2nd
>
> What has to do my config configuration and the OS i'm running with the fact that WBload has to connect to any server ????????? at any time, without i know about it ????????
>
>
> Thank you,
> Angie
>
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:03:29 +0200, Philippe PAQUET wrote:
>
> >From times to times when i stop (or reboot) the PC, i get that error message : "WBload, Unable to start communication with server" + a button [OK], then unless i click OK or press CTRL+ALT+DEL to stop WBload, the PC don't reboot or stop
> >
> >Does it mean Stardock is connecting on my PC all day ?? (to look after which skin i use for example ...)
> >
> >BUT i NEVER saw any advertissment from Stardock about that practise even when i installed it the first time !!!
> >
> >Anyway, how can i disable this feature ??? (or have control on it ?)
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Philippe PAQUET
>
>
> ===================================================
>
> Stardock Support
> 17292 Farmington Rd
> Livonia, MI 48152
> United States
> Phone:
> (734) - 762 - 0687
> FAX
> (734) - 762 - 0690
>
> For best results, use Stardock's news server:
> news://news.stardock.com and visit the appropriate news group.
> https://www.stardock.com
>
>
[copy off]
I have no record of an ObjectBar issue being reported to support@stardock.com. |
I said it was posted on the newsgroup ... and it was not about an issue but about a question i asked to how do some thing ...
Saying that you "get no answer of all that ... " is obviously not true |
where do you see a valid and correcting answer to the question i asked ???