Try later. They are very picky about walls that are put online. The policy is only the best walls are shown. Using filters will more than likely get a thumbs down. The monitors sent me an email when my wall got rejected so server busy is not a rejection notice.

It's not so much the filters used it's the overall wall looking good. Trust me I've had many moderated which I though were cool and it didn't have anything to do with what I though about them. I've been fairly lucky the last few times but that's probably because I'm getting better at all this.....just keep trying and don't despair when you think your best has been denied it can only make you try harder to make something that will be uploaded.......but make something you enjoy and take pleasure making.

Ahh... i see. I didnt go all gung-ho on the filters on my wall. So hopefully mine gets online so you guys can take a look at it.

mattboy...
'Schmeltzer' didn't make it, I'm afraid.
I think it's a difference in interpretation of 'all gung-ho'.
The lens-flare filter is such a 'groovy effect' that it gets used and abused by everyone just starting out and exploring their graphics proggy.
It has a 'gee-whiz' factor about it, like much of the early attempts in Bryce and similar.
The new person goes 'wow'...the old hand goes 'Dear God, not again'.

Walls submitted to Wincustomize.com are 'moderated', which means that not every wall is accepted. In fact, only about 10% are accepted at best.

Don't be discouraged, just keep at it...

then please tell me how that one wallpaper "trapped in bryceworld" or something made it on here. That was complete crap. lol.

Well anyways. Ill try something different. *With less filters...* ....lol, back to the drawing board i guess.