Lately it seems like Wincustomize places a higher emphasis on applications associated with Stardock rather than skins (and wallpapers for example) found within Wincustomize's library. Not that it's a bad idea at all--to be sure, both Stardock and this site can benefit with providing a free, large library of skins and walls--good bragging material for their commercial products which support these free skins. Observing this, some of us ask where does Stardock get these skins? Their users, who freely develop skins and themes, which is smart marketing: create products which allow users to continually develop interesting skins to refresh the product's look and style. Given this, the site's VOLENTEER moderators should naturally offer very little moderation, in terms of rejection, for sections like WB as opposed to wallpapers.
I will just end this off saying that, for the sake of consistancy, these VOLENTEER moderators should accept and reject themes and skins for different products indifferently, without bias, whether their criteria may be of quality work or not, not whatever is most convenient.
Naturally, I may very well have misconcieved of the fundamentals of skin/theme/wall submissions, the average numbers of Litestep, Logons, WinMedia submitted to WC may be very low. In a way I'm curious to find out a bit more about WC stats. I should also note that as a user, I appreciate Wincustomize for its content, message boards, and the ability to connect with other users who share my interests.
Anyway, by this time I'm sure i've pissed off a few poeple so of course, let the flaming begin...
-Chickenbow