bit-101, I understand what you are saying, and yes, you have a right to speak and to be heard.
One thing I think gets overlooked in all these Impulse discussion threads is that, unless I'm mistaken, Impulse is also Stardock's way of combatting the use of stolen software. It's not JUST an installer/updater.
As for the point that Impulse is larger than the software it supports, Impulse supports much more than just Fences. Now, if it were all about you, you'd have a point. But it isn't. Millions of people use Stardock products, and most of them use several products. Yes you paid for a product, but most of Stardock's products, if not all, plainly state in the system requirements that Impulse is required. So you agreed to Impulse when you bought the software.
Now you'll have to agree that Stardock has a right to protect it's software, and it is usually safe to assume that how they do it is their choice. We may not like the way they choose to do it, but it isn't up to us.
Input is welcome, and should always be expressed and taken as an opinion, or suggestion, if you will.
We do get a lot of Impulse bashing threads, which this isn't, and it does get old. So please forgive us if we get a tad testy about it, because, in my opinion, it's really not such a huge deal.
So although I'm sure Stardock appreciates your suggestion/opinion, I seriously doubt them changing the way they deliver, update and protect their interests/software.