I'm fully aware that this product is shareware, otherwise why would there be a registered version?
I wouldn't be here if I knew what the trial length was, let alone a length at all. If I had known I had so many days to use it, I would've used it accordingly.
If I wanted to know how to bypass this trial limit (which doesn't seem to exist from my time using it), I would've asked, not covered it up with...this.
Then again, why put a continue button on an ad when the button doesn't work? It's clearly not meant to do that, otherwise it would've told me to buy or something, like the many many other programs I've used that, after the limit, refuses to let me use the program and tells me to register, rather than annoying me with these little disappearing stunts.
Does this disappearing button problem really look like a trial limit indiciation to you?
In any case, this morning it somehow changed to its "normal" state (the ad comes up and I can click out of it), which does indeed go to show that it's a flaw in the element, not an indication or implication to buy the product. Such assumptions really don't help and aren't needed.
I have no need to register because I can deal with the ad (which has been there since day one, so it has nothing to do with a trial limit), and I'll certainly never use the "bonus features" the registered version provides, so I don't see any benefits of buying it. If this "shareware" did indeed have a trial limit that made the program refuse to start upon reaching the limit, I'm sure millions of users would be in a rage.
*the end*