Hi Reppiks,
I respect your opinion, but I think you're wrong in a couple of things, maybe the metaphors you have written are just not right.
The basic idea - paying some subscription makes you feel member of the community - this is all right. You will pay, hundreds will pay, hundreds will not pay. However my metaphor for this would be that I go to a restaurant, order a decent lunch, eat it, enjoy it, pay for it, and then before leaving the waiter tells me, that now that I have payed for the food, I have to pay for coming into the restaurant as well.
From my point of view, if I have to subscribe to access the otherwise free content that I use with my otherwise payed software, however there are 2 WB skins a year I download, neither I will subscribe to WC, nor will I renew my OD subscription.
The community feeling is great. Helping out --I do it regularly-- feels great. Paying to be able to keep up the operation of a community is more than acceptable.
But WC is a business driver for Stardock. It's not a nursery school. They do it to keep up Stardocks business, to keep up their job. (Even if someone might volunteer for some reason, there's a reason otherwise noone would do it.) They do their job very well BTW, I enjoy their products very much and enjoy WC. But I'd be more willing to pay 10 bucks more for OD every year and keep the download area free, than paying for the applications, and paying for the site that "sells" the product I have already purchased.
BTW does it make any sense to advertise Stardock products in banners on WC? The returning visitors know Stardock products, read the news entries about them. Once I got fed up with multiplicity ad, I started to filter out stardock ads on WC pages.
Why can't those banners used for paid advertisments, and finance the operations from its income? Everyone wozuld understand ads are needed. I'm not saying I wouldn't admit that operations of WC is costly, I just doubt I should be paying for that.