An email sent to support 2 weeks ago never replied to, except the auto responder saying I would hear within a couple of days.

did that email contain specific instructions on what to do if a response is not recieved within the time frame. All mine did.

I decided to re-read the original auto-reply since the above reply makes it sound like I somehow did not do something that caused this problem with response. It says visit the related newsgroup, the one not responded to since June. It also says visit the forums, which I did with this post. And it gives a lot of links for FAQs on problems that have nothing to do with the problem or product I detailed. I see reasons why they might not respond, but this does not qualify for that either. I did originally miss the resend piece and have done that.

The "it is being forwarded" reply was actually a response 3 days after my original request. My mistake, I did get one response. Does not change the issue I bring up. Is BN still being supported?

It also says visit the forums, which I did with this post.

I didn't actually see anything related to the problem your having so there's not much help to offer. If you could give a descritpion of what problems your having it may be that someone here can help you out with at least a temporary fix.

If you could give a descritpion of what problems your having it may be that someone here can help you out with at least a temporary fix

Thanks for the helpful response. I have been a registered user for years and have paid for several Stardock products and renewals. This is the first time I have had a problem like this, but it is enough to raise an eyebrow. Quite frankly, past posts to the newsgroup on problems by myself and others for this particular product have always been slow to come, but they came. This time there appears to be a void. Here is the quote from my newsgroup and email request:

I recently noticed that I am getting server errors with BN from JoeUser. I
can post a new article with no problem, But if I go to edit or even just
open (not preview) I get "Server Communication error, article not found"
with an address at joeuser. An article window then opens with the correct
header info, but blank article text. When I close the window it asks if I
want to save a local copy. If I click the Get from server button in the
open article window I get the same error. I can view it fine in the Preview
window.

I have the latest version of BN and I can access and edit or delete the
article from a web browser.

I got a short note saying it was being forwarded to developers.

That IS a response, ergo the thread heading No support response is bad business does not apply to Stardock's handling of your query....but perhaps pertains to practises in general.

It's perhaps not a 'solution', but it IS a response.

If and when the 'developers' can duplicate and/or resolve the problem the 'response' may be even pertinent to your issue...

That IS a response, ergo the thread heading

That is playing with semantics. The heading stands. I have run support centers and this would be considered a customer not receiving a response to their problems and it is bad business to fall into that approach. It may very well be, and likely is, a problem isolated to a specific point at Stardock, but if it affects a paying customer in a negative way it is a bad business practice that reflects on the whole company. Every person who works there represents them in their entirety and their actions create the image for the company as a whole.

Like I said, even a note saying it is being looked at by those who should be looking at it is better than dead air. I like Stardock, have for years. That is why I have shelled out a lot of money over the years for their products. This concerns me. It is fine to defend them no matter what, but if there is a problem it is in their best interests for the customer to say so and expect it to be addressed, even if it ends up being a tie straightening for the customer.

Just as an aside to all of this, apparently this was necessary. This is the first response to Blog Navigator problems I have seen since June. Developer Lantec has done more in the past hour than has been received in the past 3 months. It should not have had to come to this kind of agitated post by someone like me to accomplish that. I am completely satisfied with Developer Lantec's attempts to help, even asking questions makes me feel like someone cares and that the product is still supported. I understand solutions can take time and I understand the difference between a response and a solution. The posts here are direct responses to my problems, not solutions, but they are designed to get to a solution. I am fine with that until a solution presents itself.

The NEXT procedure is to wait a reasonable length of time for your 'problem' to be tested and resolved, noting that 'reasonable length' is open to conjecture

I agree. Since no problems have been responded to in the newsgroup since June and I am not the only one not getting a response via email (as stated in the newsgroup), I think it qualifies as a reasonable amount of time to at least have an acknowledgement that it is still being looked at by those who might find the solution.

I am not trying to be confrontative, just get some support for a problem with something I purchased. I think 2 weeks would be considered reasonable anywhere for at least an ackowledgement by those actually looking at the problem. Right now, for all I know the "forwarded" email has not even been looked at.

I don't know what your relationship to Stardock is, but it is not my intent to get in to an argument over what qualifies as "reasonable" support. I am the paying customer. In my view I have not received support for something I paid for. It is not an opinion formed after waiting only a couple of days or because I did not like the answer I got on the problem. There is nothing out of line with my reaction to this and it would be viewed that way most anywhere.

I would be extremely surprised (and dismayed) if the management at Stardock looked at this set of circumstances and said "This guy has no issue". If I am feeling this way and others are having similar experiences, it is likely others are feeling this way too. When customers start feeling this way they start avoiding the company in question. Customers are lost and business flags. I don't think this is what Stardock is trying to do. I think they care about their customers and do not want them to have experiences like this. If it took an agitated thread subject to get the ball rolling then so be it. I am sure they will look at why it happened and how it can be avoided in the future.

To be fair, others may have apparently no response via the mewsgroup since June...yes, a long time....but again my reference to reasonable time pertains to your specific reference to '9 days ago'.

My 'relationship to Stardock' is specifically as Admin here on Wincustomize.com....and that entails being 'the voice of reason'.....and tend to pick up 'agitated threads' on my radar.  

As is suggested...try #stardock as well [IRC].  You will quite probably get some more assistance there....

My 'relationship to Stardock' is specifically as Admin here on Wincustomize.com....and that entails being 'the voice of reason'.....and tend to pick up 'agitated threads' on my radar.

As any good admin should. Thanks for clarifying that.

Sorry I can't help more....with several thousand users here, someone else may see the thread who can.

You have helped plenty. Thank you very much. It may turn out to be some change at Joeuser - again - and it may turn out to be as simple as a config file getting corrupted. Or it could be a bug introduced in the last version. I won't mess with anything without knowing what I am doing so I don't further cloud the problem.

I would prefer the standard web-email support method as stated at Stardock for support. I don't do IRC and don't allow it installed on any home computers or work computers (I oversee IT among other things). It is not the same animal as when I used it in eons past The risks far outweigh the benefits, I have children at home who can get to wrong place pretty quickly and I have workers at the office who could pass for some of my children. It is blocked at the firewall and as a hash restriction, so no small undertaking just to track someone down outside the standard procedures as set by Stardock.

If anyone there can help pry loose some support via the methods most expect to be in, that would be greatly appreciated.

The risks far outweigh the benefits, I have children at home who can get to wrong place pretty quickly and I have workers at the office who could pass for some of my children

Couldn't agree more. My son doesn't understand why all his friends are on chat but I won't let him do it. Frankly I won't let him online without an adult in the room period. I don't allow it on the systems at work either.

I'm really sorry for the said situation to happen. I'm personally responsible for it. Over the past month I've been buried under SkinStudio development work.

We'll be taking care of Blog Navigator over the coming days, and will try to answer and fix the problems our users reported to the newsgroup.

I've looked into your issue and it looks like it's a server-side problem with JoeUser as I can post articles to my other test blogs and read them just fine. The problem seems to be related to the JoeUser XML-RPC api and I'll be working with the JoeUser developer to resolve the problem.

Thank you for your patience. Should you have any more issues with Blog Navigator / SkinStudio or IconDeveloper, do not hesitate to mail me directly at adam AT stardock.com.