
This is a port...in fact both the Winamp and Litestep 'skins' are 'ports'.
97 images edited 'per-pixel' for the LS theme, some of which [27] are multi-state animations...... a further 25 involved with the Winamp skin.
Not one part of it is 'point-and-click'.
What happens is that people who dismiss ports as 'inferior' make value judgements which do not necessarily apply to all examples. Sure, some Skinstudio porting may be better executed than others .... and it may 'seem' like an unfair advantage in comparison to those who start with an original concept - from scratch.
But what do we do next? Differentiate between those who use SKS vs those who do it by hand?
How about those who use freeware graphic proggies vs those who shell out thousands on high-end Cad or Photoshop, Maya, etc?
The point is....everyone is a 'skinner'...either way....'original hand-made' can be 'shitty' just as easily as 'point-and-click ports can.
The LAST thing anyone 'should' want in this game is to discriminate through elitism and drive potential new blood away.
There was a time when EVERY skin was derived/ported from others...as there WAS no skinning 'tool' to make it easier for ANYONE.
Let's face it....is it all a case of jealousy that now there is a way to import/create skins which were once resigned to the realm of voodoo and dark science? And now everyone is/can be indoctrinated to the 'brotherhood'....