Oh and as far as the "resource hog" deal, where did that story start? |
Combination of things....back in the very early days, long befor WinXP, [or even 2000], WB in its infancy was like any pre-beta sort of thing....would fall over now and then.  [I know proggies that have been around for a decade or so in commercial release that still trip up often].
WB moved on from those early days and with the advent of XP went from strength to strength....only problem was that XP's inherent 'skinning engine' enabled a simplistic 'alternative' proggy [for want of a better term] to evolve as 'competition' to the established Stardock product.
Now there's 'competition' and then there's 'competition'....and the one we got was the 'let's spread lies to knobble the established so we get a foot-hold in the marketplace' type.
They were also the 'our alternative will always be free, ergo better' crowd that clearly had a short memory.....albeit nous as a marketing ploy.....suck 'em in with lies and blind them with the price [lack of], then when the fish is hooked...up the fee.
Unfortunately, anyone misguided through apathy or ignorance who chose the wrong 'skinning' option generally did nothing more than to add to the misconceptions to their own detriment and that of those who followed.
The simple reality is that Windowblinds is the only option for real freedom in skin creation.....far more options, ergo far more diversity in styles.
The 'opposition' [their mind-set, not ours] counter that 'minimalism' is the ideal....however that is due to their inability to create anything but minimalism due to the inherent limitations of their 'product'.
 
Guess that about covers it....