major dittos same here

I agree wholeheartedly with Frogboy. We have to live together here in this webland....this forum although created to provide others with a service and a creative outlet was not by any means intended to be an outlet for agression or attack. You have a right to voice your opinion and to logically create an argument to the opposition...but when it turns into soapbox selling and opponent bashing......

well frankly my dear that's when I cease to give a damn.

I haven't spent almost a half a century living breathing and learning on this planet to have someone chew me up spit me out and make mortar for their own platform out of my opinions....and I honestly would never do that to any of you.

At risk of sounding corny......if you don't have anything harmlessly entertaining, constructive, amusing or helpful to say........

what?????????????????????? I can't hear you!!!!!!!!!!!

Jafo is Australian so "aggression" is not part of his vocabulary really. Sweet and Cuddly like a Koala Bear from what I've heard.


hehehe

Who......me?.....

Yes, I'm going this weekend, I can't wait.

Let's just speculate for a second, that there are people who voted for Bush last election, who are having their doubts about whether to vote for him or Kerry....on the fence so to speak. Why does the Democratic Party allow/accept the lunacidal rantings of Mikie to be associated with them? You would figure that someone "sitting on the fence" would be fairly moderate in their views and the extremist views of Mikie would just turn them off. Am I mistaken, has there been any disassociation from the Dems, particularly from Kerry? The only thing I heard was that during a screening with a ed audience of 600 or so Democrats, Mikie's latest home video got a practical standing ovation.

My questions concerned more the moderate viewpoints that most Americans have, not the extremist points of view from either party. I would think that reachings from the far left would push people that are, so to speak, in the middle towards the right, much in the same way, that the extremist views of Pat Buchanan effected Republicans in the past. Kerry has his own weaknesses. Is Michael Moore the answer to those weaknesses? Is the timing of Clinton's book the answer to those weaknesses? To me these events seem to be more of a distraction from the importance of knowing what John Kerry is going to bring to the table for the next four years if he is elected. How does the Democratic Party get the public to embrace John Kerry, to bring the fence-sitters to their camp? I would have expected the Democrats to do so by presenting their agenda for America for the next four years. What I see instead is a smoke screen. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I don't see John Kerry, I see Michael Moore, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, the 9/11 comission, the war on terror, etc. Somehow I am missing Kerry's message.

When Bill Clinton ran for president, this was not the case with the Democratic Party. There was a clear message being sent to America. The message was clear and you gained a sense that Bill Clinton was the man to get done the vision that was presented. I don't get that same warm fuzzy feeling this time around. I instead get a feeling of anger and insecurity coming from the Democratic Party.

dabe, why are you "miffed"? Please present your point of view. "I HATE Bush and every stinkin' thing he stands for" That can't possibly be your point of view. George Bush is still an American, a Christian, a father, a husband. He believes in America, he believes he is doing the right thing for America, he has family values. I might mock Michael Moore, by being in the public eye, he like Bush or Kerry will be mocked by someone at some point, they know that and accept it as part of the package, but I don't HATE Michael Moore and every stinkin' thing he stands for. I am after all just one of the "stupid Americans" as Mikie so affectionately likes to think of us

That documentary made alot of money.
I gave more money to movie industry lol
I went to see Spiderman 2, White Chicks and Dodgeball in same day last weekend lol.

I am not American and I didn't see the movie. But from what I've read about it, it is indeed pretty convincing. It may be just a bunch of lies (how do you verify that?) or not, but the movie is apparently quite good at convincing the audience that it is the truth. Or at least that part of it is. From what I read, this movie will not convince the die-hard republicans but would no doubt convince the fence-sitter you're referring to, Essencay.

Personnally, I will wait till it's out in video.

*holding out for 'Daughter of Old Yeller"

hehehe

*Some People are stupid enough to pay Michael Moore to lie to them.

Sugaree giggles

Actually " big fat stupid crack smoking kook" would not be appropriate. One of the symptoms of smoking crack is loss of appetite and massive weight loss. He would more than likely be smoking massive amounts of pot to maintain his girth.