dabe

Join Date 09/2003

Question about media players

I used to be a big fan of WinAmp. Actually, I still am. But, I've been experimenting with QCD, and it seems quite good. I'm not really comfortable with WMP, which is a shame because it seems to be the only one that DX recognizes. Anyway, my question is about resources. Both WA and QCD seem to use up quite a bit of resources, whether minimized or not, and particularly when not minimized. But, I'm not sure which uses less, though I've tried to determine. I don't use the visual thingy on either one. That's a total waste. I have 512 MB RAM, but when a player results in CPU usage of appx 50% (my CPU is a 1.2ghz antique), it really causes apps to crawl. Any suggestions? Any thoughts? Any any?
TIA
dabe confused about terminology, maybe

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

Snowman

Join Date 03/2001

+343

Might I suggest useing classic skins for WinAmp?!
Some modern skins tend to suck up a fair bit of CPU juice!

Cant really suggest other players though, since WinAmp has been my fave for the last umm.... many years

Successfully updated karma reason!

Both WA and QCD seem to use up quite a bit of resources, whether minimized or not, and particularly when not minimized

This suggests to me that the real culprit is video. Specifically, I would guess that the skin you are using has some type of animation, scrolling text, etc which requires a significant amount of redrawing. What type of video card are you using and how much Video RAM does it have? If the card is older/slower and has little or no Video RAM, then your computer has to draw on system resources to accomplish that redrawing.

Successfully updated karma reason!

I like QCD quite a bit and find it to be far less piggish than Winamp 5 with a modern skin on my underpowered computer. It's about on par with with Winamp using a classic skin.

That said, I've pretty much been using Foobar for the most part, especially with the UI Columns plugin
[Message Edited]

Successfully updated karma reason!

Sign Up or Login and this ad disappears!
There are many great features available to you once you register. Sign Up for a free account and browse the forums without ads.

A decent media utility is Media player Classic.
Not only does it handle most formats, codecs and whatnot, It's Free.

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=82303&package_id=84358

The only annoyance, is when some pins in file graphs fail to initialize, it messages ya.
This can be turned off, in the preff's.

The players works decent, and seems to be low res usage, and the UI is straight forward.
Feel free to give it a try.

Successfully updated karma reason!

DavidK

Join Date 03/2001

Cool Player is a good alternative for a media player that's light on resources and it's skinnable.

http://coolplayer.sourceforge.net/

Successfully updated karma reason!

Thanks, DavidK. I downloaded Coolplayer, and I'm trying it. I never tried it before because I was happy with WinAmp. Anyway, I gotta say, the default skin for CoolPlayer is UGGGLLLY..... You know what they say..... "There's no accountin' for taste."

Anyway, it does work well, easy on resources, though I do like Winamp better. I only use the Winamp default skin, but vary the color schemes. Great program. Anyone have the Pro version? Is it worth the money? I just downloaded Deep Burn for burning my mp3's to CD's, but it doesn't seem to recognize file names. Just lists them as Track 1, Track 2, etc. Spoze I can't complain DeepBurner is free. I believe WA Pro has burn capability, which sure could be handy.

And, speaking of skins, I cannot figure out how to apply the CoolPlayer skins. I've downloaded two, unzipped them to the CoolPlayer folder, but the program just doesn't see them. Also, why doesn't SDC list CoolPlayer?.

TIA

Successfully updated karma reason!

OOps!!!! Just after I hit send on the last post, I realized that I might offend someone about calling the CoolPlayer skin ugly. I apologize. Truly. Maybe it's me and my taste.
dabe is sorry.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Jafo

Join Date 03/2001

+1845

Coolplayer is not a Stardock product...

Successfully updated karma reason!

Jafo, of course. I shoulda known. So, does that mean I don't have to worry about offending anyone, or not?

I think I'm sticking with WinAmp. The resource difference is not that significant, and WA is alot nicer to run.

Thanks anyway....

Successfully updated karma reason!

Jafo

Join Date 03/2001

+1845

dabe....as skinners we generally resist denigrating any specific skinnable software....not all that 'clever' to do so.

We may be frustrated with one vs another...but all these proggies are what we 'play with'.....so they are our 'friends'...

Successfully updated karma reason!