I agree with White_Moth

IMO ... one of the things we have learned is that cowering in holes isn't that good of an idea either. Nor would I be that proud of taking lessons from madmen. I intend to continue living my life much as I ever have, risks and all. And if I ever die in some terrorist attack, it will be the end of an independent, fully lived life and not one lived on my knees in fear. I have done enough of that. I will admire aspiration and innovation and culture and beauty and tradition and democracy. This building incorporates a design that uses environmentally generated power, which is not only good for the environment but a trend which takes us away from dangerous dependences and that is something I wholeheartedly applaud. It has also makes use of many safety features that were either ignored or not available before. It is a constructive statement of remembrance and support and not something destructive and I also applaud that.



...er goodmorphing steps down from soapbox.

carry on
[Message Edited]

I am simply sayimg:
"When someone builds/paints a bullseye, someone else will always aim at the heart of it, and hit it."

..and madmen are the ones who cower in holes begging for their lives even though they slaughtered thousands of others who had the strength and conviction to die with dignity....as we have seen and learned.

I am reminded of what became of such prideful structures as The Tower of Babel and The Stone Walls of Jerusalem.

I don't wish to further stir up the hornet's nest, but I tend to agree with White_Moth. Terrorists chose the WTC as their target due to it's symbolizing the American 'ego', for want of a better word, and to simply build a bigger (and potentially more fragile) structure in its place is just downright stupidity.

I think President Bush has already demonstrated just how little tolerance America has for terrorists, although perhaps using a method akin to swatting a fly with a brick wall, so a new structure should be more about remembering those we lost than being a sign of defiance. I think something small and peaceful would have been more respectful and less of a challenge to terrorists to have another go.

I know I'll get flamed to death for my opinions, but there ya go.

The larger the target, the more casualties in the event of an attack. I'm sure that there won't ever be another attack on the scale of the WTC, but simple logic dictates that another solution should be found.

If I learnt one thing in kindergarten, it's that if you build a tower of blocks high enough some kid will come along and knock it down. If you then rebuild the tower with a few more blocks, the mean kid will only be more likely to try again. If, on the other hand, you shrug your shoulders and go off to play with something else that kid will go elsewhere to get his kicks.

Did I just make a kindergarten analogy? It really has been a long week...

"It's better to get killed on feet, not live on knees."

Hmm I don't think I got the quote right, but I intend to live on my feet till something happens or to my old age not on my knees, in fear of dangers.

I don't think it's dumb actually.

Actually the office portions of the building stop at 79, I think. The twin towers were each 100+. The height of this monument is partially taken by the wind generators, which I think is especially poignant. I hope it is the beginning of a complete movement to stop our dependency on oil. I hope it represents a heartfelt statement that others will listen to and emulate. Not only for political reasons, but for the ecology as well. Clean energy, cut the ties to oil ... what a fitting monument.

Modern Architecture tends to embrace sustainable energy and efficiency as the cost of 'running' a modern massive structure escalates.

When pre-occupying oneself with concerns of history, heritage and monument it's important to remember/be aware that Architecture is about social design, growth and direction, not about making 'stuff'.

Society's Architects are charged with the concrete [pun] fabrication of the Community's future direction.

It's irrelevant that a proposed replacement to the WTC be a bigger or lesser 'target' to potential attack, but that the Society it 'monuments' not be swayed from the legitimacy of being that WAS the WTC.

When I studied Architecture I was initally bemused that 3 of the included subjects of the 44 were Sociology, Psychology and Philosophy...but 'doing them' I soon understood their importance was greater than 'Materials and Structures 1', etc.

We all create our environment at one level or another.....whether it's by grafitti, littering, murder, rape, having kids, building shopping malls, helping in soup kitchens or bossing the corporate machine.

The only really appropriate 'thing' for the WTC site is simply another WTC structure.  Its very existence is the tribute/monument, and all that'd be 'good' to be added would be a commemorative 'stone' listing the names of those who died.....nothing OTT or dominant, just simple, genuine, and honest.

Future generations do not need the event force-fed, just not forgotten.

Future generations is what structures of this sort are all about [once one ignores the corporate investment profiteering, that is]....not so much the 'past' but 'future heritage'....

Please don't anyone start thinking I am in the habit of lumping any groups of people together simply because I have ideas that differ than yours. That couldn't be further from the truth and is totally uncalled for.

me want moon coloony. they couldn't terrorize that.

The importance of the freedom tower is a monument to those who died and to show that terrorists will not make us whimper. They would still find a way to terrorize if we built a smaller safer tower.

Hmn...philosophising aside, I just find the design aesthetically lacking IMO. Looks like it's more about the architects egos than building a aesthetically attractive building. But that's just my first thought/opinion when I saw the unveiling on TV. I don't have to live with it on my skyline. Just glad those guys didn't design the Statue of Liberty, the Flatiron building, Brooklyn Bridge, etc.

Hum. I got nothing to say against the building itself. Looks cool. Probably will be quite impressive. Maybe a target, but one must not live forever in fear. Building this great structure is a great example of how the USA must overcome fear and grieve, and proudly build a symbol to look at with pride.

However... one thing really bugged me reading the article, and watching the video interview.  Now, I'm sorry, but when I first read "the height, 1,776 feet, reflects 'a date that speaks to the whole world'", I was trying to figure it out... failing to see the realtionship between the date Sept 11 2001 and the figure 1,776. Failing to do so, I read the rest of the sentence and then understood that it was the date of the US independance.  Therefore what bugs me is the American presumption that the whole world knows the date of their independance, and furthermore that such a date is an imprtant date for the rest of the world. Sorry to carry the bad news, but most of the rest of the World knows next to nothing about the date of the US independance, and really don't care much about it. It may be of great importance and a great symbol for US citizens, but please avoid sentence as "a date that speaks to the whole world".