Eugenics for any reason, no matter how you wrap it up and present it is wrong, period in my opinion.
But after reflection I do not feel that is the perspective where ChasUGC is coming from with their comments.
Maybe as presented it leaves to much to question, but still it is a very vaild position with the structure of things as they have been in the past and the total contradictoin of how thye are presented today in the funding and support our government lends to USAID.
The issue is inter-twined with many other seemingly different topics which all fit into the same matrix. Illegal Immigration, Welfare, Homelessness, Foriegn Aid, National Laws and moral stance compared to National Foreign Aid Policy, Religion's (including Athiestisum and on down the spectrum), claims of National Security and many more that are not listed. But as I said, I do feel it is just as valid an position and one that should be looked at even if in the end it is found to be something that should never be taken up. As long as the question sit's out there un-ansered it breaths life and as long as it hold's life there is a possibility of it being realized.
So bashing it, denying it and or looking the other way do nothing more than to qwell it for the moment while leaving an opening for it to revive itself down the road.
How knows, there might be some very valid and positive things that could be brought out of such consideration if found to be something to never consider again.
Though, Chas did in fact structure the wording in such a way as to indicate a feeling that the Mentall Ill are not fit to be allowed the right to live based on the reasoning that they are an undue burden on society (eugenice is exactly what that position defines as presented and it is also something that was used to clear out all mental institutions and mentall ill people in Germany before WWII started and durring WWII)
anyway...
If we are going to start soemthing along this lines I vote we start with the IRS agents
