Delicious on more than one occasion now you have shown a lack of understanding of the concept of Public Beta software and its inherent expectation of potential bugs and de-activated features, insinuating, no, stating that this is a clear failing of the software.
On occasion, a limited public gets the opportunity to be on the ground floor, or at the 'coal face' of new program development.....before it is released as a 'full' public program.
OD subscribers have this opportunity....the 'assumption' being that they are sufficiently computer-savvy or at least Stardock-skin-customization-program savvy [in this case] to be able to distinguish between an Alpha, Beta or Full release, and perhaps provide valuable product function feedback.
Instead the response is...'keep away from WB4...it's buggy as hell, etc'....when all you needed to say was 'be careful, pre-release Betas can have strange behaviour, but so far I have found 3.5 to be OK'.
It's all about wording and perception.
For the record, sarcasm is not becoming.