Didn't mean to exclude anyone - just put a few of the 'usual suspects' in as a 'f'rinstance'. Icons/signatures could be used in lieu of pictures (except in Hanker's case ) if anyone has privacy concerns (did Fuzzy that way as an example).

This is a cool idea however. Where would the pictures be submitted? On a thread specifically for this? There most likely are several people in the same area. I can see a problem trying to place several pictures over a smaller State. May be able to do it but some of the pictures may be so small you can't even tell what a person looks like.

Than there is the last thing. I may be so old I can't see the forest through the trees and may be missing the whole thought process of this. 

So, a world map... how exactly do you put millions of members names and faces on it?  Kind of crowded, yes? 

One of you will fill the whole State up.

How's about a 'simple' Google earth pin type system? Like this:

Just with current WinC forum avatars instead of the pins.

How about something like this and it is also ZOOM-ABLE

http://www.fallingskies.com/alienmosaic

No, Jim. It's something I see on almost every thread...and you're not the only one who does it.

You couldn't be bothered to even read the (numerous) 13 comments before you before you jumped up with the same thing. At least DT1 went to the trouble of trying to solve a question he read in 2 comments (and which was answered).

1. DaveBax, reply 3: "I can see a problem trying to place several pictures over a smaller State. May be able to do it but some of the pictures may be so small you can't even tell what a person looks like."

2. teddybearcholla resply 5: "how exactly do you put millions of members names and faces on it?  Kind of crowded, yes?"

3. RedneckDude reply 8: "I'm intrigued. Just wondering though, what if you get so many from one state that there's no room?"

Without trying whatever the subject is, people here have to automatically start poking holes in it instead of trying to help propose a solution to something they actually try. That's defined as negativism.

If you try, and fail, then at least it's experience based. Not here, though. 

TRY, then ask a "question". Or at least have the courtesy to read the replies before your anxiety to be the one who shoots an idea down overcomes you.

Here's the original mock up:

Putting Shelby_GT_TheCar in TX wouldn't be a big problem. Getting a higher res map wouldn't be a problem...stop dreaming up "why it can't work" and "make it work".

4. RedneckDude reply 14 "It was a simple, and very pertinent question."

Bullshit. It was a repetition of a question above it. It was negativism. You couldn't even be bothered to read the comments above your brilliance.

To quote you? "Jeez."

How about you come up with an idea and an actual mock up? That would be positive.

4. Philly0381 reply 12: "I thought this was done once several years ago or is my imagination running wild again?"

Why not take the trouble to actually look up the answer to your own question before hastening to ask it?

Just look at the number of actual comments. How many of them are positive about anything? To hell with this.

OK, Doc. You win. So, I overlooked some of the other statements.

Your comments to me borderline a personal attack and I am not crazy about your tone.

Yes, I overlooked a few comments. Get over it.

I will state my opinion on this site as well as the next guy. I have the right to be wrong, and I have the right to reply.

I am done here.

Forgive me for asking a question. Even if it had already been asked.

JEEZ.