baker is a man of strong, valid, unwavering opinion, not always totally in accord with everyone, but still well respected.
Argument, and/or opinion only need be founded on a modicum of logic and reason to find acceptance.
Yes, I DO 'read anything that people say'. The difference is I also tend to comprehend what is said.
Were people in general privvy to the dross that is often uploaded in the guise of 'wallpapers' here and thankfully rejected, my humorously intended comment re what to upload to guarantee rejection would have more pith.
The wall section won't be removed. It is a valid and worthwhile portion of what is regarded as 'GUI customizing', albeit a popularly accessible one, requiring less 'skinning-oriented program interface' understanding to create it. [though just HOW some people manage to discover a resolution that does NOT exist in a PC/monitor environment is beyond me]...
Frequently, an artist/contributor will experience a 'moderation' of one [or more] of his works and 'logically' deduce that he is being victimized. It happened back in the genesis of skin site 'wall moderation', years ago at skinz.org and it happens here....as sure as night follows day.
Then a thread will appear demanding 'why?' in one form or another, and the site's admins will be obliged to respond, yet again.
The submission of works to this site can be regarded as a 'right'. It IS a 'free world'.
The acceptance of these same works is, however a 'privilege', not a right, and are subject to criteria for acceptance, just as members' conduct is 'criteria for acceptance'.
I guess this won't be the last time that the wall moderation process is discussed/validated....maybe I should copy/paste all of them together and title it 'War and Peace'....[it'd end up about the same size]....