On the contrary...air superiority aircraft would be the best to be unmanned because the limits of the human body directly limit the flight capabilities of combat aircraft...we could make aircraft much better at dodging bullets or missiles, but they would accelerate so quickly that the human pilot just couldn't take it....
It'll be a long time, if ever.
The issues of High 'G' combat are to all intents and purposes meaningless as more and more we have seen the demise of 'dog fighting' since its origins in WW1.
The stand-off deployment of air-to-air missiles is seeing an end to the dog-fight. OK, they 'thought' it was gone pre Vietnam and suddenly found themselves adding cannon to F4s [the first didn't have them' - the last to do so time-wise was the Crusader. Vulcan cannons will be the last to 'go'.... being significantly effective rate-of-fire.
Current tech simply uses aerodynamically UNSTABLE aircraft made flyable by computer supervision enabling what was impossible dynamics. [look up 'cobra'].
INTELLIGENT piloting of a strike aircraft is why the SAC is still using planes....when ICBMs are supposedly 'better'....
