The whiner is probably complaining that WB doesn't skin his one handed pr0n browsing window.

""It Sucks"
It will load the skins broken or you will lose part of the screen. "

What ? I have to uninstall WB at once !

I really wonder, how people manage to get the official WB-builds crashing. I bet, this guy never had it installed, or his machine was messed up really bad before...

or his incompetent (computer illiterate) parents bought him a pc and he is just as incompetent at using it...

Hmm, just because some sites use ratings, doesn't mean it's good or better here. This just further proves ratings stink.

TV ratings especially suck. I've seen some great shows get kicked to the curb...

Kinrik, yes, but usually I find it's the other way around. Most movies that I see rated badly are usually bad, but some movies I see rated as "Masterpiece" (in the TV Guide for example) are... OMG! so boring I could die from watching it!!

What's usually frustrating are the militant "Style XP advocates" who are unaware that when they're pushing Style XP what they are really doing is advocating Microsoft's "skin format" take over. So we end up with people who have not even tried WIndowBlinds or at least the version in question just using its popularity as an excuse to push Style XP.

That is particularly frustrating. I'd be the first to admit that WindowBlinds isn't perfect. But it uses hardly any resources and it doesn't slow down a modern PC in what one would consider a noticeable way (certainly no more than Luna).

ditto adni18...rattings?

Does Michael Jordan walk around smacking everyone in the forehead with his thang? Nope. Why? No need. When you got the M4D Sk11LZ, everyone who is on the same battleground knows it, and to hell with the backseat drivers...

WindowBlinds is not good how do you tink and always say (this is normal in a site like this, where the more important author is the WndiwBlinds creator).
StyleXP is not bad. It skins more WindowsXP aspects than WindowBlinds.
But WIndowblinds have a advantage: more expeirence on the market, more customers, the program updates in little time margins, it have addons (buttons, options, plugins), and the more important (comparating with StyleXP):
-A good site with lots of elegant and exquisite skins.
Also, it have a advantage (not only over stylexp): For little amount of money you have the best enhancing Windows suite of programs.

That's right Ryan8024!

I wonder why Carlitus said that "StyleXP ... It skins more WindowsXP aspects than WindowBlinds". Is this true? I find it hurt to believe it.

No. I'm ObectDesktop customer
But WindowBlinds can skin the toolwindows frames; sometimes does this task in UIS1 mode (as TheGreenreaper commented on a thread on this messageborad, look their skin BlackComb, it works in some apps but crashes sometimes); WinXP skin the toolbars without problems.
I don't say that StyleXP are better. WindowBlinds have more customization options than StyleXP, and WB have more good designed skins.
I don't wish to offend WindowBlinds programmers, their skinners and the vendor Stardock on their website... i only comment the differences between WindowBlinds and STyleXP.
I don't appreciate a Application or a skin reading the comments and rates that posted the users... for experience i know that a good skin can be poor rated, or. a simple and recursive skin are highly appreciated.
Maybe, WIndowBlinds and Winamp are the first popular skinned applications, and the first will be always one step forward than others

Carlitus...I'll help you with your English....I'm Australian, so I speak perfect English....[that's a joke, BTW....not the 'help', the 'perfect']....