Things I look for in a WB Skin.

Lotherius

Join Date 09/2003

Things I look for in a WB Skin.

I was told by an anonymous pigeon that I rate too lowly on some WB skins. With that in mind, I've tried to rate a skin more on its inherent merits rather than only whether I like it or not. So I've created a system to rate a skin. There are certain things I believe a skin must have to be useful, and lacking them means it is less than perfect.

1: Needs to be original. Recolored versions of Luna, Longhorn, etc are not original. If it's a MAC clone skin, it needs something that sets it apart from the crowd of other MAC clone skins (this includes Aqua, Tiger, et alius).

2: Needs to be complete. Menus and dialogues that look unfinished, or use ordinary windows objects show me that the skinner didn't care to take the time to finish his skin. A skin should cover all the bases, and be a complete makover. Missing parts are not acceptable.

3: Needs to be relatively high contrast. This may be personal opinion, or maybe not. Fact is, some very beautiful skins are rubbish as far as actual usability is concerned, because once you get them on the screen, you can't read certain items such as: Titlebars, Menu Items, Buttons and Tabs. This is especially true for the darker coloured skins. Dark should not mean hard to read.

4: Window controls should always be in the preview screenshot, as should the start menu. These are the most important things (even though personally I never see the start menu, as I use OD+). If these are not in the preview, then it is difficult to give a fair analysis without actually downloading and installing the skin, which is almost a form of blackmail on the author's part to get more downloads. Therefore, if you don't include these things in your screenshot, I have no choice but to rate lowly.

5: If the skin requires a specific wallpaper to look good, that wallpaper should be included with the skin if at all possible (ie, you own the wallpaper or have permission to distribute it). Having to make a seperate download artificially inflates the author's download count.

6: Fonts should be clearly readable and fit within the areas given by the skin. Some fonts are too large, and run off the sides of buttons, etc. This should be avoided. Fonts that overlap parts of the window controls (including titlebar text that strays outside its box) are a no-no.

7: If you have custom "controls", they need to not have too high a premium of screenspace. Keep them small. Label them clearly enough so they can be found and clicked on. I once used a skin for a day before I realized it had winamp controls on it. Additionally, offer a substyle without the controls, or offer some configuration. Not everyone uses the same software you do. Having a beautiful skin loaded down with controls for a program you don't use is rather pointless.

8: Keep down the clutter. I'm not saying all skins need to be simple, but too much noise can reduce the overall effect. Find a theme, and stick with it.

9: If I see "magic pink" showing anywhere, you lose several points right there.

10: This one is subjective. The graphics used for the various objects in the skin need to be cleanly drawn or rendered. Unexpected breaks, things that don't line up, fuzziness where fuzziness isn't expected, buttons that don't "sit naturally" on their background, all these things are unattractive and can ruin an otherwise beautiful skin.

So, mostly these are the things I'm looking at on skins. If a skin does well on all categories, it'll get a 9 or a 10. If it breaks the rules of all the categories, I'm not afraid to give it a 1.

skinning

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

(sorry about no direct quotes, they don't seem to work in FireFox for some reason)...

ChasUGC: I don't go through and rate everything... Typically, I rate a skin if either:
1: I have used it myself (as you all suggest)
2: I feel that it does not have the rating it deserves.

If there weren't subjective criteria to rate skins, then WC wouldn't need a system where slected site members could rate skins - a single person could run down the list of objective criteria and give a single rating that works for everybody. In reality, everybody is going to be bringing their personal opinion into a rating. Thus, a rating is merely consensus. A skin that maintains a 10 rating throughout many different people's ratings has obviously got something going for it that one which one person rates 10 and another 7 and another 8, has.

As far as going through the entire library, that would be a bit silly, because for one, a skin written in 1999 cannot compare to current skins purely because of feature limitations at the time, so they should keep the rating they got when relatively new. I typically will only rate newer skins that have few ratings to begin with.

I suppose I'll stop doing that since my efforts to contribute to the site are not appreciated by the establishment.

I will maintain however, that while a screenshot cannot show things such as animations, that when the basics are left out, I refuse to download the skin just to see what should have been in the preview (basic window controls, etc)... Very few skins leave all this stuff out, but some do. Downloads are a "vote" for a skin as much as, or more than, a rating is. So, I'm not going to download merely because the author didn't feel like showing off his work in the preview.

With this in mind however, a lot of skins are going to have only the initial rating given by the mod that approved it. That means that not very many people felt like the skin was worth downloading and rating at all, right?

Unfortunately, a single rating doesn't reflect consensus. Many sites don't publicly show the rating at all until 5 ratings have been made. Maybe WC needs something like that, so a skin doesn't get blessed or cursed by the initial mod rating. Rating won't show at all - until there's a consensus.
[Message Edited]

Successfully updated karma reason!

a lot of skins are going to have only the initial rating given by the mod that approved it. That means that not very many people felt like the skin was worth downloading and rating at all, right?

skins uploaded by journeyman and above go in with a generic "6" and no initial rating. First rating that hits them sticks. Not everyone that downloads stuff has the ability to rate skins. I think that it's important for artists in specific category's example WB artists to work together to help newer artists improve, to download and rate skins in the category you skin in. I now it's not written anywhere, but I just think when someone becomes an apprentice or above, they need to give back more to the community....I don't think that's asking too much.

Successfully updated karma reason!