MISGUIDED REDNECK MISSES THE POINT ENTIRELY!
Quite right, it is Stardocks' right to impose Impulse on buyers of Fences Pro. If I don't like it, I should not buy Fences Pro. But that is NOT the issue or the problem!
Stardocks is obligated to clearly and adequately inform potential buyers about the requirement to install Impulse. Stardocks fails to do that.
Stardocks does not adequately inform potential buyers about the Impulse requirement. Their statement about the Impulse requirement does not explain what Impulse is or what it does--it is inadequate and vague! Also, it is placed in the wrong location on the Fences web page; therefore, potential buyers are unlikely to notice the Impulse requirement before hitting the 'buy' button.
It does not matter that Impulse is a relatively harmless piece of software. Just as Stardocks has the right to require Impulse as a prerequisite to using Fences, I too have the right to decide what software to install or not to install ON MY PC! If Stardocks fails to give adequate notice of the Impulse requirement, then Stardocks has abused my right of choice.
IN ESSENCE, Redneck, your point is like saying that if the government abolishes the right to practice religion, it shouldn't matter to atheists. Sorry, but Stardocks the manfacturer has rights...but I the Consumer have rights too. SUCH IS THE HEART AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS ISSUE!