Eeeh, if you pirate, and don't buy the game after trying it, you weren't going to buy it anyways.  And by suggesting that people do that, on a developer/publisher's site, well, why should they even bother to listen to you?

Sure, maybe you can find the physical media at a cheaper price.  By all means, go for it.  But keep in mind that Impulse, and Steam, provide you with a viable option.  There are many games out there that I look at and go, "Eeeh, no thanks."  But then the game comes on sale for five dollars or ten dollars on Impulse, or Steam, and I think, "Hmmm, well, for ten bucks, it might be worth a shot."

And Stardock is proof that DRM is pointless, and only punishes their customers.  Frankly, the high prices are often due to protectionism and idiocy on a government's part, than anything else.  Or the greed of a large corporation who thinks we think more highly of them than we actually do *cough*EA I'm lookin' at you*cough*.

So yeah, put the blame where blame is due.  Me, I wholeheartedly support Stardock's (and Valve's) push to limit and remove DRM, offer lower prices and a HIGHER selection of games.

Well, speaking for me, I'd rather offer something at a high price than not offer it at all, when offering it isn't costing me anything.  Yes, it makes some people unhappy, but if I'm not the one who set the prices why in the world would I care?

Some Europeans will buy it, some won't, no skin off my back.

Go bitch at the publisher en-masse if you want something to change.  Whining on message boards is like throwing a rock at a mob of people and hoping it hits the right one (and the right one is even there.)  You're not bloody likely to change anything by complaining at people who really have no say in the matter.

Well on this we shall have to disagree. I'd rather not get raped than get raped with lube.

But I really don't care if you want to blame the giant pink elephant floating around the sun for your current policies. The simple fact is you're providing an identical product through an identical method and as such the cost should be identical...anything else is simply unfair and you are a party to that.

I'm sure most of you at Stardock (and subsequently the fanboys) will assume i'm saying this out of spite, but its quite the opposite. The largest group on Steam for example relates to this specific problem (dollar:euro conversion) with over 20,000 members. Just please don't forget that it doesnt matter how many games you have to sell if no-one will buy them from you.

It makes more sense to focus on ensuring a market share of consumers by fight on behalf of the consumer (as you did with your "gamers bill of rights"), winning their trust and respect and thus increasing your profits as a result than it does selling a million different games to a miniscule audience.

I am one of those people who left Steam because of this practice...there are a LOT more of us and i've no doubt we'll happily leave Impulse if you keep it up too (not that we want too, 'cause you're better )

Now i've read over this a few times to make sure it makes sense, but i'm drunk so just incase I didn't get the point across...you're cool Stardock, but please stop fucking me over just because i'm from Europe.

It doesn't make sense to pick fights with the publishers you're relying on to sell games from, actually.  I'm pretty sure Impulse wouldn't have half the games they have if Stardock suddenly decided to start throwing their lack of weight around and fight for a cause they have no vested interest in to begin with.  And then, suddenly they wouldn't be able to sell the games to the American market either, because nobody would want to deal with them!

This conversation is reminding me of that magazine I used to read where the readers started mouthing off to the advertisers.  That was hilarious.

I'll buy both.  Only company I hate dealing with is Ubisoft, who has no sense whatsoever when it comes to the PC market.