Maybe he just forgot to think...

Same here, I've been a user since 2003.  I've never ever had an issue with Stardock products not once.

In all my 19 years of troubleshooting and repairing PC's, I've always said that "if you never turn a computer on, that computer will never break." 

But since people do turn them on and since they do break, human intervention has to be automatically implied.

So that's a choice.

Posting "It worked for me" is almost as pointless as "It broke for me."  Better to post specifics if you are having a problem and comment on that only if you have had a similar problem [hopefully resolved].

It's called taking responsibility and ownership for your Personal Computer.

It is funny how some of you get all offended by a post that isn't even personally directed to you, and yet so quick to judge other users because they may be experiencing problems, by basically calling them computer illiterates (fanboy behavior).

I have been working as a computer repairman for the past 15 years and have had more than my share of trouble with some of these products. It is true that Stardock does not lie about the system requirements of their software, but they forget to mention that they will only work under certain software configurations. WB has only started working properly for me on my Vista x64 since the 6.40 update, and I didn't change anything else on my system. The patch just so happened to fix whatever bugs were causing the problem.

Most people who buy software expect it to work out of the box, and most software does work out of the box. I own a long list of programs that I have either bought or downloaded for free over the years, and I can say WB is definetily the fussiest one. And I understand how this may be frustrating to the average user. Maybe adding the word "beta" at the end of the product name until the well-known bugs are known to be wiped out would be a good idea.

I love Stardock products when they work with my system, but at the same time I empathize with those facing problems. Calling the company "liars" is unfair. Assuming that all those having trouble are idiots is also unfair.

WB works really good on XP because it has been out for 8 years. The companies have had plenty of time to figure things out. But people are moving to Vista, which is still relatively new, and now that Windows 7 is almost here, we are not about to see the end of this.

If I judge by the posts in this thread, the problems I was experiencing with WB prior to 6.40 were caused either by a lack of computer skills on my part, or a bad software configuration on both my computers. Obviously, something was preventing WB from loading, I don't know what it was, and I'll probably never know. Fact is, on the day I bought WB I was unable to use it, and it was frustrating. When you buy a product, you expect it to work, period.

Both my PC's exceed by far the system requirements listed on the page, unless you are telling me that x64 isn't supported, in which case you should make that clear on the page as you did with XP. Anyways the 6.40 update magically fixed the problem, just as I was about to give up on it or beg for technical support.

The same thing happened when I installed Bootskin when it appeared in Impulse. Never worked for me until the lastest update. Even on a freshly formatted computer. Now, it would be interesting to find out which programs or drivers were interfering, but now that everything seem to be working OK, I don't have an interest in going back to older versions and experimenting.

There should be a list of known incompatible drivers and programs on the main product page. If there is already one, make it more visible so that people can know what to expect BEFORE they hit the Buy button. And stop blaming everything on the users, it is bad marketing.

i really dont think anyone is BLAMING the user here...just saying its not kool to call the company LIARS if and when the USER has NO COMPUTER SKILLS!...try to figure it out on your own first, try different things....DONT COME TO THE SITE AND MAKE ACCUSATIONS

Point is, not everyone who buys a piece of software is willing to become a full time researcher, that's the job of a beta tester. And also it doesn't say anywhere that being a computer expert is a requirement to use these products. And it isn't easy to figure out the cause of these problems, even if you are an expert. And some people have complicated set-ups that make it difficult .or impossible to try all the different combinations. The reason this thread is being dismissed by everyone is because of the word "liars". Change the title to "Stardock are unclear about the requirements" and the original poster has a valid point.

PS: Why do you assume that person has no skills, unless you know him/her?

How about this: Fresh vista install + firefux + windowblinds = so far 4 crashes of explorer.exe, all because of windowblinds

Here we go again! What a great community.

First and last time I spend money on a stardock program.

+10 Agreed, it seems this community's way (or at least vstyler's) on solving the problems is: "Get a better PC." or saying "Has to be SOMEthing your doing wrong." while epically ignoring the fact that there is something actually WRONG with their software. I faced problems on at least 3 different vista instalations already.

@jafo, great, so you're just telling me to uninstall my software which i need every day and see of windowblinds works well?

There's nothing wrong with this community, just because there will be several here countering the posts which attempt to apportion a system's maladies to one specific product or another.

Yes, there have been HUNDREDS of posts complaining about a system issue with such Stardock products as Windowblinds....but that is the nature of the human beast.....it will typically only voice displeasure...rather than praise.... yet there are millions [the silent majority] who either have NO ISSUE AT ALL or such insignificant that they have nothing to complain about....in other words the particular program actually works as intended.

Unfortunately, Wincustomize.com is the largest online sounding-board for any/all of the disasters/failures/errors....so a casual observer here assumes the worst.

Remember...inside a car wreckers' yard you might surmise that all cars crash.

They don't..