Windows 7 it is...now for my wish list

Frogboy

Join Date 03/2001

+2419

Windows 7 it is...now for my wish list

So it's official, the successor Windows Vista is Windows 7.

Windows 7 is designed to be all the things Windows Vista wasn't including:

It's faster. MUCH faster.
It's cleaner. The UI has been cleaned up a lot.
It's easier to use. A lot of the functionality is more streamlined
It's richer. The ribbon seen in Office becomes part of the OS allowing app developers to have a standardized way of taking their apps to the next generation UI (I love the ribbon).
The UAC is...a little bit better. I still think Microsoft should have a setting to allow signed applications to be always okay'd by users if they want.
It apparently has a new Start menu and taskbar.
The included applets are modernized
It may come with native VHD (virtual hard disks) support
Better system tray handling

That's all well and good but I have a few other things I'd like to see added to the list:

Make it 64-bit only. PLLEEASE!
Give us better and cleaner access to manage the junk that loads on boot-up. (Stardock TweakWindows 7 will certainly do this otherwise)
Make it a LOT easier to share drives over the Internet

Let me talk about 64-bit a little bit. A lot of people don't realize just how much effort developers have to go through to support 64-bit and 32-bit. It's a mess. Windows 7 is a great opportunity to cut the umbilical cord on legacy 32-bit. Most modern PCs are already 64-bit. They're just running a 32-bit OS which is a shame. Drivers, desktop enhancements, and all kinds of other things have to do special versions for 64-bit because most people run 32-bit OSes on their 64-bit hardware.

Memory is incredibly cheap and yet we're still stuck with a 2 gig limit on program memory use (a pain for game developers trying to have lots of rich textures). My next PC is going to have 16 gigs on it minimum.

Moreover, the handle issue of 32-bit NT OSes pretty much goes away at 64-bit. It's just a vastly more robust experience.

I'm typing this on a Thinkpad T400 which is running Vista 64 and the experience has been phenomenal (and it only has 4 gigs but I end up with an extra gig of disk caching).

Consider the performance ramifications of a system that has massive amounts of memory. You leave your PC on long enough and you could end up with massive amounts of it stored in a huge disk cache. Windows is using 2GB for caching my system right now and the performance difference is noticeable - very noticeable. If I could get 8GB for this machine, I would.

So hopefully, we'll see Windows 7 get a lot more 64-bit users.

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

mickeko

Join Date 09/2008

+126

I think the major reason for the lack of 64bit support is because of the signed-driver requirement. Imho it's a good idea, but getting a signing certificate should be free... Verification by cash is a horrible way to solve it.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Quoting mickeko,

reply 1

Things such as display drivers work fine in beta, IE: Nvidia drivers. And no, you don't have to hit f8 everytime to disable the signed-driver requirement to use them.

Successfully updated karma reason!

mickeko

Join Date 09/2008

+126

Quoting Astyanax,

reply 2

Things such as display drivers work fine in beta, IE: Nvidia drivers. And no, you don't have to hit f8 everytime to disable the signed-driver requirement to use them.

It's a beta, obviously the requirement is disabled. We'll see if they put it in by the time it gets released.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Sign Up or Login and this ad disappears!
There are many great features available to you once you register. Sign Up for a free account and browse the forums without ads.

It's a beta, obviously the requirement is disabled. We'll see if they put it in by the time it gets released.

I'm talking about Vista here, it should be the same in Win7.

Successfully updated karma reason!

CobraA1

Join Date 09/2006

+26

Things such as display drivers work fine in beta, IE: Nvidia drivers. And no, you don't have to hit f8 everytime to disable the signed-driver requirement to use them.

It's a beta, obviously the requirement is disabled. We'll see if they put it in by the time it gets released.

nVidia's drivers are all signed, otherwise they would not work in Vista 64 bit (which they do).

In addition, all of nVidia's drivers are WHQL certified, which requires, among other things, 64 bit support.

AFAIK, all of the major manufacturers are signing their drivers now. Most of them are also offering WHQL ceritified drivers.

64 bit support is very good right now - I've yet to enounter a new device that doesn't support it. I'm having troubles finding this "lack of support" you caim exists.

Successfully updated karma reason!

elvee

Join Date 03/2001

+113

More proof that Microsoft wants Windows 7 out in 2009

elvee quietly waits to get rid of 'VistaME'

And yes...64bit

...sorry for the big text on the link...

Successfully updated karma reason!

Quoting Astyanax,

reply 17

No doubt. I'll likely hang with Vista64 if they dont remove the DRM crap to be honest.
Vista has that same DRM so does it really matter?

I'm not talking about the DRM for Vista activation, which does suck, but the media DRM layer M$ built into Vista for third party hardware and software.

Successfully updated karma reason!

I'm not talking about the DRM for Vista activation, which does suck, but the media DRM layer M$ built into Vista for third party hardware and software.

Yes, thats what I was referring to.

Successfully updated karma reason!

mickeko

Join Date 09/2008

+126

Quoting elvee,

reply 6

More proof that Microsoft wants Windows 7 out in 2009

elvee quietly waits to get rid of 'VistaME'

And yes...64bit

...sorry for the big text on the link...

I made a slightly more proper translation of the alleged schedule (http://blogs.msdn.com/partnerblogg/archive/2009/01/30/n-gra-h-ndelser-inf-r-lanseringen-av-windows-7.aspx) for you guys:

Some events in view of the Windows 7 launch

Questions are raised about points in view of the Windows 7 launch

I asked Michael Bohlin, product manager, here are some dates, more or less definitive.

February 26, TechNet and TrueSec med Microsoft Windows 7 Summit.

March 17-18, TechDays in Västerås, our largest Windows 7 event during springtime.

May 31, Microsoft self installed ( ?? Yeah, I didn't get what that's suppose to mean even in swedish... )

Early April, after CEBIT, RC released.

June, July, August, Summercheck with a lot of presentations.

RTM and business release Q3 2009 as things seem at the moment. . The average of all intenal guesses here at the office at the moment is Oct 3 11.10AM.

February 2010 - Boxed in stores

Progressive information from Michael Bohlin the 7:th each month ( lots of saturday mail). The concept is prepared based on 7 Summits.

This is the business launch. Work on consumer launch is done in parallell.

/Lotta Båth

That's the lot. I'm not a professional translator, but I'm confident it's fairly accurate.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Hmmm... I would think they would want it out before black Friday. If people know a new OS is coming out just after x-mas it will likely kill sales for PCs again. Did they not learn the lesson last time?

Successfully updated karma reason!

mickeko

Join Date 09/2008

+126

Quoting Spartan,

reply 10

PC Manufacturers get it Q3 2009 according to the list, which mean it'll likely be bundled with PCs before xmas.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Quoting mickeko,

reply 11

PC Manufacturers get it Q3 2009 according to the list, which mean it'll likely be bundled with PCs before xmas.

OK. I assumed that was for testing purposes and not real retail sales; that is the best way to go then.

Successfully updated karma reason!