Steam didn't have competition when it was released 5 years ago.  Impulse is being released at a time when Steam  has an existing user base that would need a compelling reason to make a switch.  Of course this is only concerning games at the moment but who's to say that Steam wont add applications to their offerings. 

Just guessing, but I bet that most Impulse users installed to play games.  Wanting features that many are already used to on another system should be expected.  This wasn't a post meant to bash Impulse.  I want Impulse to succeed, otherwise I wouldn't have posted at all.

Thanks for the feedback.  A couple of things: First, what matters to one group doesn't necessarly matter to another.  Steam has an impressive user base but it took 5 years to get to 15 million accounts. 15 million seems like a big number but it's a tiny percentage of the PC market.  The community features you mention are certainly important to hard core gamers and Impulse aims to have its own set of compelling community features. Even on day 1, I would ague that the community features in Impulse are pretty decent.  Give us a few months and I think you'll see that Impulse's features will grow by leaps and bounds.

What I have found more concerning is the tendancy of gamers to actually WANT a monopoly in digital distribution. 

Now, I like Steam.  But here's something most people probably don't remember: In the early 90s it was OS/2 vs. Windows. And at the time, Windows got a huge HUGE advantage from the media and from the "power user" community simply because people loved Microsoft back then.  Microsoft were the good guys and IBM was the bad guy. 

Now, today, it's hard to imagine Microsoft as the scrappy, universally loved, up and comers that they were viewed as in the early 90s.  But that's how they were seen. 

So when people ardently wish that Steam could just own the whole market and rely on Valve to solve all their problems and hope that everyone just hands everyhting to Steam, I can't help but be reminded that this was exactly the same way people viewed Microsoft back then.

Anyone rooting for ONE platform to win should seriously consider the logical ramifications of that victory.  The best thing for consumers would be for there to be choice. 

I got it for Galactic Civilizations II originally and later got into WindowBlinds.



Steam has a great catalog of games. But that's all it has. Games. And what about Steamworks? How does that help me? Clever named announcements don't do anything. When steam first came out it barely worked. Give impulse some time.

Same, I have absoutely NO interest in gaming whatsoever. I'm a customizer. And from what I've seen, the people doing the most complaining about Impulse are the gamers. Whining about DRM stuff and all the extra "bloat" (being the customizing stuff, which is aimed at another audience entirely, it's not JUST for gamers), saying how it's "doomed" and that it can't compare to Steam, who said it was trying to? Impulse isn't ONLY about gaming, it has so much more.

Thanks to people like you, we will be able to keep on top of what things need to be done.

I don't see Impulse as something people would use to replace Steam.  Impulse and Steam are solutions to a larger problem - every freaking app installing some half-designed auto-updating program and other junk.

If anyone needs convincing why programs like Impulse and Steam are needed, they need only to go to their neighbor's house and look at the junk being autostarted every time - much of it there to check for updates.

There has to be a balance between 500 auto updating programs and 1.