I believe she's getting paid by ABC/Disney/Barbara Wa-wa.
Not that those people are getting any real value out of the payments they make

As to this by Loca:
I say if the point of tax cuts is to stimulate the economy, give them to the poor people. They know how to spend. Rich people will just put it in a mutual fund. |
*cough* b.s. *cough*
Sorry, but that is so patently untrue and bogus I have to call b.s. on the statement.
Poor people will spend. Ok, I can agree with that. But will they make wise choices in their spending or will they simply run off and buy something they didn't really need just because they think they have some extra income? More likely the latter.
If those poor people are running out buying new clothing, new shoes, new tires for their car, fixing up their homes, or otherwise improving their quality of life beyond buying themselves a new HDTV, then great. If not, then they are most likely wasting the money that was robbed from the rich so that they could spend it, and oh, yeah, by the way, will wind up back in the hands of the fairly wealthy business people that profit from the purchases that are made by those poor people when their stocks rise after good earnings reports, good sales reports, etc.
You (Loca) say that the rich people will just put it into a mutual fund. Possibly. Or they might possibly go trade in the 'benz to get a new one for Buffy or Muffy or whomever. And that money will likely trickle it's way down through the economy (yes, trickle down does work to some extent).
If they put the money into a mutual fund though, who really cares? Whose money is it that they are stealing to provide these benefits anyway? uh, the wealthy, right? Oooops, not really, it's the children and grandchildren of the wealthy who won't get big inheritances, and won't get all of the money that was earned in the generations prior as the government taxes that income and wealth away to redistribute it now.
Personally I think it would be great if the government handed everyone an investment in a mutual fund that had about an 80% penalty for early withdrawal -- meaning they put that "$1200" that they are giving couples into a mutual fund/certificate of deposit type investment that pays $1200 + interest and dividends (on the growth of the fund) after say a two year period if held that long, and continues to grow if held long term. If cashed in earlier than two years the receipient loses 80% of the money so they can take the money and run if they really want, but will find they get almost nothing for having done so.
Best of all worlds though as it would really teach a lot of poorer individuals the value of investing in the market and let them grow their own wealth.
Too bad it won't happen.