Well, when it comes right down to it, I really don't care how you perceive our company compared to other companies.
I'm sorry, but that's truly pathetic. You allowed yourself to say that Stardock is better than most companies so it's only fair that I'm allowed to question that by drawing comparisons to other companies and making conclusions from that.
All you have done is complain that you don't like the delivery system for the alpha.
That it not true and you know it. I have complained about the following:
1. Lack of information about progress and development
2. Lack of stable updates
3. Lack of alphas/betas
4. Lack of proactive feedback from developers to beta testers.
5. Lack of common sense in making the alpha available on least deployed software delivery system.
Need I continue with the list?
Understand this: you are the only one complaining about this
Yet, I'm not the only one complaining about Impulse. Would you like me to provide you with the link to the forum where people have expressed their views about how bad it is?
You bought the product 2 years ago. You spent $20 TWO years ago. You got what you paid for TWO years ago....as many updates as you assume we should provide
Excuse me, but I fail to see how this changes anything. As far as I know, there's no statute of limitation on how long you have the license for OD, especially considering that we're still in the 1.x phase. And I don't assume, I expect software that I bought to work 100%, that's my right to expect and your obligation to make sure.
These are betas and we let you use them. We update our customers with news and with the products we are testing. Our developers listen to the customers over months of testing and developing
You're making it sound that by providing betas you're doing us a favour. That's a flawed way of thinking because if betas provide fixes to existing bugs, and they normally do, then it's your obligation to provide them. You say that you provide your customers with the news? What news have there been since 1.9 was released at the end of April last year? Peanuts of information and only when we ask first. Your developers might be listening but why don't they respond? Where's the feedback that would encourage a proactive relationship between beta testers and devs? It's nowhere.
You are insulting us because you can't get what you want the way you want it
You might not be aware of an expression, but if you are then let me refresh your memory: "He who pays the piper calls the tune". As such, it's quite within my right to demand any of the aforementioned points.
Even if you don't believe it or are unwilling to I have several hundred thousand people I talk to every day that seem to think otherwise. Several million worldwide. Our current practices are winning an entire computing world over. Thus our strategies are working, and the customers are happy.
I'm sorry, but that's not really the point. Even a teaspoon of crap in a barrel of honey will make it taste not as sweet, so to speak. It's not about how many people are happy, it's about how you deal with people who aren't happy. Considering that you don't even inform people on OD product page that the Free version won't be updated as often as the Plus version, I fail to see how that's a good practice. Once again, we're coming back around to lack of (or unwillingness to share) information.