Probably the only issue you have is deciding whether you wish to be associated, however tenuously, with what may or may not be neo-fascist...or white supremacist, KKK, etc.
Historically the LAH Divisions etc were/are simply facets of WW11 German militaria...and not necessarily different to any other, Axis OR Allied.
I've always been interested in WW2 Armour, since I was a rug-rat. There was a chap called Michel Wittmann who was the armour equivalent of a 'Fighter Ace', as Commander of a Tiger 1 he destroyed 88 allied tanks before losing his own...and went on to 138 before becoming MIA in Aug, '44. This showed both a tactical and technical superiority over his opponents which could be 'appreciated' as a skill, albeit undesired.
He was assigned to the LAH [Waffen SS .... LAH stands for Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler], eventually receiving a Knight's Cross [Oak Leaves and swords]. Von Richtoffen had much the same [Cross] in WW1 [the Red Baron].
Military historians have no 'issue' with all of that...it's simply 'history'.
Where it may become an issue is with spotty-faced skin-heads who have absolutely no idea of what it was all about in 39-45 abusing it all as a rally-point for present-day disingenuation with society.
That means it is not about WHAT you may have created as an image/icon but rather WHO is wanting to use it....and WHY.
If you think it'll be misused....simply say "Thanks, but NO." ...