I can't believe the nerve of that site. They got one of my blinds too. I emailed that person to remove my blind. There is a feedback button on the left side under the nav menu. It gives you the email address of that person (name escapes me, but he is the one that is claiming to be the auther of these blinds...H something or other.)

Some of the author's windowblinds I recognized are Z71, lypnjta, Bushman, JJ Ying, navigatsio, MikeB314, basj, Josephs, Night Train, Boxxi, danilloc, and Butch 123. I didn't check the other galleries.

Maybe one of the mods know of a better way to get a hold of the person responsible for this.  

I just got a reply from him:

Hello jazzymjr,
i don't understand why should i ask you for a permission if i link to your
work on deviantart???
This is your work here
http://computer-arts.info/2006/12/24/dockside_windowblinds_theme.html
Of course I would remove your work from my site, but I didn't hosting your
files anyway. So please be so kind and explain what I did wrong.


Amd, here is my response:

That windowblind is copyrighted to me, and therefore, I am the only one who has the right to decide where my blind is seen. It's doesn't matter that you are just "linking" to it, you do not have my permission to do that. And, another thing, you have yourself listed as the "author" of the blind underneath it, despite you listing me as the author in the title. This is called "ripping" and is illegal. Please remove my blind.


I can't believe his nerve!!!!

Well i'm the owner of computer-arts.info, so if any of authors think me or my friends have "ripped" your work please contact me and it would be removed immediately. Our goal wasn't to rip but promote some work, well and also be promoted
Whith regards
DJ.Hmelnitzki

DJ.Hmelnitzki

Proper procedure is NOT to take first and wait for complaint second.

It is to ASK first and [perhaps] receive consent second.

You are remote-linking to Deviantart.com content, however you are providing a frontend via your site which may or may not appeal to the artists whose works you are using/linking.

They have not given you permission to have their works displayed on, or associated with your site therefore they should be removed.

It is neither fair nor appropriate that you put the onus upon the artist to request the removal of their works' links.

thanks to all for the postings
since i don't wanna violating the international Copyright Law i decide to take the page down untill i get some permission from authors.

I couldn't believe my eyes reading all this "discussion".

Guys, are you living in Stone Age? There is no explanation to divide people into isolated groups with ridiculous rules inside. Xenophobia and racism are crimes in any civilized country.

Internet as it exists now, has no nationality, humans are equal in any country.Frankly speaking, Internet has no limitations: laws remain only words. Everybody is free to post any links and information they want. This is the "freedom of speech".

The next question is for designers: why do you do your work? Why do you post it here? What do you expect from users? Money? Success? Fame? The most common answer is fame. So let other people be excited with your creations and increase your "fame level".


In any ways I don't justify ripping, repacking or publishing material without specifying authors or links to their sites.


SKoriginals,
This is a nonsense to ask permission for linking to a public site (DevArt, for example). And the greater rot is to ask permission for personal use. Did at least one user asked permission for downloading? If you publish there, it becomes public for ever.

As for me, I believe this is the real popularity when other sites publish my work. I think it doesn't matter, from where the content is downloaded. The main thing is the content. I am 100% sure that every designer, who respects himself, enclose at least a readme-file or his name can be seen directly in application (like "Skin preview" in WB).

There is no need to cite pre-historical documents, because Internet appeared not so long ago. This document is not applicable here. Electronic interaction requires special legal documents.



By the way, www.computer-arts.info is situated in EU and is attended by people from over 50 countries of the world. This is an international community. Why Russian?!

I am not trying to quarrel, but the things I wrote are so obvious... Peace!

Its my property I upload for Private use by others.any other use needs AUTHORIZATION BY me....my material is not uploaded for some yahoo to build a site and use my stuff to pad his pockets by selling ad space while using mine and others stuff as bait for traffic..I control it's distribution on the net. not you....you get to look at it and apply it. you dont get to offer it out as your own, and by distributing it you try to take possesion and distribution rights away from me...and by offering it out for download you imply that you are an authorized representative of mine and have permission to do so...which is not the case...


also direct linking detracts traffic away from the site who hosts the files ,in hopes they will get the very traffic you are taking from them....so they pay the bills for the bandwidth and the server space and you get the rewards? please explain why you deem that as fair???? WC/DA and other's host authorized works for people to download they use the traffic to pay for the sites up keep.. if you steal that traffic they loose . we loose... get the picture?


build a legit site, get permissions and authorization. and you get respect and a place among the community..


Build a rip site and we will come with hell hounds on your heels...

HG_Eliminator, probably you're not dedicated to marketing. Let me explain on basics.
A factory produces the goods, you go to the nearest mediator (e.g.shop) and get what you want. The mediator is the "ripping"-site, the goods are GUI stuff and the factory is a known public site. In other words, you provide your work without asking money and on a public site to any ordinary user for private use.

Imagine all internet surfers. Then you have to admit: no-one knows every site in the world. People use google to navigate. That is why one share of surfers knows public site and regularly visit it, other is not familiar. These people use other internet resources to find news. In the end both shares will know about your work at public site. That is how you increase your audience.

Then you complain about traffic. But don't you know, that hosting is not free for normal sites? Both mediator-sites and public sites pay bills. And both of them advertise. This is normal practice. But public site pays a bit more - this is the price of popularity and ratings. Mediator-sites are often to reupload original archives to mass-share sites (Like Rapidshare).
More people - more money. It seems to me, your goal is not fame, but money. I can advise you to make your own site and promote only there your work with severe restrictions.

Some time ago there was a precedent. One commercial site took icons from one very famous and talented artist and used directly in their site interface (this is the POSESSION). This is the real violation. Hein Mevissen had not been releasing for a long time since that.
Real commercial use (as I described) does not equal your subjective perception. Please do not use sophistry and don't substitute concepts.

it dont matter what I post and where .. reproduction of it and distribution of it without my prior consent is not allowed and is copyright infringement...if they were posting a screen shot with my stuff being used, then that would fall under fan art.... but this is not screen shots, these are downloads/distribution...which is taking away my right to control the distribution and use of my content/material........



me and most here would agree we dont need or want any site hosting our stuff that dont respect us enough to ask our permission....

it boils down to morals and common decency, which it seems on the net, some people loose theirs or just never had any.....

I like many others here dont need or want the kind of publicity RIP or warez sites have to offer...and yes I compare RIP sites to warez sites, as they both offer illegally distributed items......and both are bad in my eyes...

Data-mining another site's content for profit or gain is hardly legal.

It is not a question of fame OR fortune that someone may or may not want their property displayed/accessed elsewhere.  The ONLY person profitting from such property/copyright abuse is the site owner.

This issue is that same old issue of Intellectual property rights, or, in the case of this content....Artists' Copyright.

There are many 'pre-historical' documents.  Some actually currently apply, as their age does not weary them....eg. the US Constitution ain't no spring chicken....shall we dismiss it for its dust?

And sorry, mate it [Berne Treaty] actually DOES still apply.

Artists/skinners very happily put their works on such public sites as WC, DA, Custo, SA, etc because their 'market reach' is massive and doesn't need to be enhanced by backyard profiteers leeching [data-mining] the content.

Were such leeching purely altruistic prior consent would be sought.

Since it wasn't [and since subsequent comments from its admin/owner] it can be assumed it was done through ignorance of copyright restriction/s.

Again, people CHOOSE where and when their artistic works are displayed.  Finding them subsequently displayed on a site without their permission is a slap-in-the-face insult and violation of their property rights [though some will always be oblivious to/ ignore their property rights and think such redistribution is 'fame'].

The upside of all this is that the site owner is now intending to remove the content/page until appropriate consent is obtained....and we salute his choice of action....

Neither could I. I could not bear to just read this nonsense and not reply.

(Citizen)va-deam
Are you for real? Either You have no idea what you are talking about.....




Or you have no moral sense.....



Rapidshare is the the choice of upload for many warez groups, consequently much of the content uploaded to Rapidshare is pirated and split into 100MB rar files. The pirated links are posted on forums and piracy websites around the world. Rapidshare has a reputation on being slow to delete files which are pirated, allowing copyrighted material to stay undeleted on Rapidshare servers for weeks, sometimes even months. Although Rapidshare has put measures in place to prevent piracy, Rapidshare gets reportedly thousands of pirated uploads per day.
Source:Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RapidShare#Issues
Reference: Heise Online 2007-01-31: http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/83948
I would figure the latter.

[quote]Why can't I open this site(http://computer-arts.info/index.php)?. ..[/quote]

Hopefully because it is offline adressing issues of copyright...