This post was moved from another forum. Here are some of my responses. As I can see I have upset many Stardock users and actually I am on your side. I understand you all enjoy Stardock products, but to blindly defend a corporation you don't work for, own, or have any deep knowledge about would seem less wise then my unpopular opinion. Here's the rest of my rant, flame me if you like, but it's the fans that make this site, not Stardock.
Some Responses.......
"I can't really say whether the free submissions are the "real reason" people come here." - That I find the biggest insult, not only Dreams, but Wallpapers and the other user contributed creations. Stardock's users are the real reason the hit count is good around here. Customers usually don't hang around a vendor's site just because they like their product and want to hang around and watch the home page. Stardock's users, from wallpaper creators to full fledged artists, make 95% of the total contribultions for content on this site. Using Deskscapes for example, Stardock provided the software and about 10-15 dreams to wet the appetite. The users in return came up with the other 200+ dreams helping Stardock to "have" a product. Had the artists not made those 200+ dream contributions, users would have been gone a long time ago because nobody hangs around a forum talking about the same old 10 dreams forever, do they?
"There's a lot of erroneous statements in what you say above. First off, I am not aware of a single feature of Object Desktop that is in Windows Vista." - exactly my point; Microsoft's improvements in Vista's GUI have put Stardock in an uncomfortable position. Microsoft threw Stardock a bone with Dreamscene's since Microsoft totally screwed Stardock's niche market all up on Vista. Like I said, Object Desktop on Vista IS BLOATWARE!!! In Stardock's heyday in the XP-era, Stardock had something unique to bring, today OS's bring it natively withhout 3rd Party intervention.
The other primary mistake you make has to do with what you consider "bloatware". - again, you stated that Vista and Object Desktop are kind of useless together so you've answered your own question.
"WindowBlinds, for instance, not only is faster than Aero, but it vastly reduces the power consumption." - So your saying that Vista Ultimate users are going to actually disable Aero in favor of WindowBlinds? You've definitely lost it now!! The dream customer is an Ultimate customer, the user who want's all of Microsoft's features and is willing to pay a premium for it. For that same user to disable Aero in favor of Windowblinds, why buy Ultimate then? Why not buy Vista Basic and save yourself the $200 or even stick with XP! So the Ultimate user is in essence paying $200 more for Dreamscenes, and Hold em' Poker. Again, most customers I know don't like throwing money away, your plan is insane!
"Why should you care if you activate a $10 wallpaper? The benefit is that activation makes it much easier for users to re-download in the future." - I don't care personally, however I was speaking for the customer who does care. Microsoft always talks about the "benefits" of activation and I haven't seen it yet. At least Microsoft is protecting a $400 product with activation like Windows Vista for an example, Stardock is making the customer inconvenienced by protecting their $10 wallpaper. Greater software has been offered with less headaches.
Even better, if your system should fail and you are reinstalling Windows and you don't take backup images like a friend of mine who purchased one, then chances are your going to have to call/e-mail Stardock to reactivate your Premium Dream; This is completely untrue. - untrue? So your saying if I reinstall Windows and attempt to reinstall my Premium Dream, no re-activation will be required as my Premium Dream will recognize that I have already registered and that even though my computer's Windows installation is now entirely different, highly unlikely. If this is true, try to pass on one of your premium dreams to a friend as a test and give your friend your registration info and see if he can install the Dream, how's it going?
Stardock has no intention of being bought out by Microsoft or anyone else. - Neither did PeopleSoft, Enron, Worldcomm or anyone else out there but guess what! Whether Stardock will be acquired by another company hinges solely on Stardocks' financials and their future viability. Stardock only has as much control as their business practices dictate. Bigger companies have talked your talk and 10 years later, found themselves eating those words. When people get bought out, it's usually not by choice, remember that!!
I understand that you have to show your vendor loyalty being that your working for Stardock, however your points were weak at best. As I said, I'm not anti-Stardock! I just don't like the direction on the Deskscapes\Dreamscenes pricing scheme simply put. Like I also said, I credit Stardock with many of Vista's native GUI featureset so actually I have given Stardock a compliment. All businesses aren't perfect, I'm simply pointing to an area that Stardock needs to work on. Thanks again for your time.
LINK TO ENTIRE POST
WWW Link