I thought it was obvious that I was talking about my use of OD, obviously I can't speak for anyone else. That's why I specified the parts I make significant use of.
I also addressed the question of ObjectDock being 'effectively' the same as tabbed Launchpad, it really doesn't matter if it's an upgrade to the current system, a rewrite or a completely new programme brought in from elsewhere. If it does the same job (which it does) with new facilities (fancy graphics, system tray etc) which it has then it 'looks like' and effectively is an upgrade, as far as the user is concerned (that's what the 'if it looks like a duck' line was about, common usage over in the UK, sorry if it didn't translate).
I accept that Stardock will make the commercial decisions they have to, if they hadn't switched to Windows they would have died off years ago, I'm sure they also made the correct commercial decision to concentrate on the fancy graphical stuff (which I personally dislike but then again I don't play computer games, which is also a huge market. I never claimed to be in the mainstream as far as computer use was concerned, most of my time is spent programming.). I regard the fancy interfaces that seem to the the thing these days as a modern trend towards presentation over content but if that's what people are prepared to pay for then that's what companies are going to produce.
I'm sure that the loss of $34 per year for my OD sub (offset by me probably buying ObjectDock which looks as if it's rather nice) won't make a significant difference to their turnover, I'm probably in a very small minority, I felt I had a point which needed airing so I aired it

Effectively it'll save me money, I'll buy the few things I want, I won't pay annually for what I don't use, to be brutally honest I've really kept it up for the last few years out of a combination of laziness where I just carried on as I had and a vague warm feeling towards Stardock which originated when they supported my OS of choice (OS/2) in the mid 90s.