Sorry, Po....there should have been a 'wink'...
Though it is reality....we don't accept them...
'Value added'...
Warhol doesn't own the can...or the label on it.
He cannot claim the can as his own 'artifact'.
Likewise a wallpaper belonging to one person cannot be 'owned' by another.
Warhol DOES own the painting of the can. He 'value-added' to the can by redefining it as a painting.
Campbells got a bit upset...though the PR must have been priceless...
The Logon uploader/skinner has more to do than just insert bitmap100 [the wall from elsewhere]. He has to also skin/draw/create a dozen or two other images.....and the sum of all that becomes the Logon....analogous to Warhol's painting.
Warhol did NOT sign the Painting 'Campbells', nor does the Logon skinner need to change his uploading nick to that of the wall artist.
Both have a responsibility [?] to not confuse ownership of that which makes up the end result.
With Warhol it was self-evident.
With [some but not all] of the Logons/boots it is not, and therein lies the problem....