| I did not mean to imply that linking to the wall removed the requierment to obscure the wall. Only that the screen shot compositor could avoid the near occasion of sin and tempation to extract the wall by just linking to the original. No control given or lost. |
The unobscured use of a wall image in a screenshot is itself an uncontrolled distribution of the wall.
Linking to a source is irrelevant.
The difference between the two forms of 'distribution' is that IF the author so wishes, by deleting the 'source' he also nullifies the link thus controlling BOTH.
However, he has no direct control over the screenshot with the unobscured wall therein.
THAT becomes the issue of distribution 'control', hence our request that the wall at least be made fairly 'difficult' to remove/extract.
A desktop screenshot should be just that, anyway, not some blank unobstructed picture of a wall....
