It doesn't matter the quality I upload here, It's ALWAYS rejected. I've recently uploaded a wall on here that has 400+ downloads in a week from the site I am Head Admin of which is skinnalicious.net |
Laoran ...if for example, you uploaded a wall/image of Britney Spears running naked through a field of daisies I'm certain you'd get [more than] 400 dls a day. It would, however not be an accepted wall, or an acceptable wall, or, for that matter a 'real' wall, but just an image for kids to ogle.
A walls 'popularity' [or lack of] elsewhere is not a criteria by which works are accepted here.
Were that the case the section would be inundated with photos of some pet doing something silly/cute/terminal....
We don't 'tick people off' as some form of sport....in fact we do not tick them off at all. However, if they choose to feel 'ticked off' over a rejection of their works then they really need to re-evaluate their ideals and life-values.
It's nice that I [and Cerebro] am deemed 'cool', however it's less than nice that my fellow brethren are considered not so. We do the same job....and it's quite rare indeed that I would consider 'pulling rank' and reverse a rejection decision, etc....so either we are all 'cool' or we are all 'not cool'...
The only decisions of what comes or goes that are made that may/do affect Stardock/Wincustomize 'customers' are actually the physical removal of the person, not their works, and almost always those who ARE removed have no 'works'. If the person is a 'current customer' then he is afforded more leeway.....usually removed from commenting/interaction but still able to access site content/downloads. Anything more 'severe' [exile] is determined by Stardock directly as it is a customer issue as well as a site one.
Wincustomize.com values each and every member and his contribution/s - equally.
However, site rules/policy can at times appear to affect some more than others but that is a causal response, not an arbitrary one....